There are many ways to solve a political crisis but the important thing is to get out well. It means first of all come out well in accordance with the rules laid by our Constitution. The hypothesis that some members of the PDL have made as to whether to dismiss one House of Parliament seems more a discourse tainted by abuse Constitution does not condone what else, but since there seems to be a veiled consensus around this view, can be interesting that even here we should be discussing a bit '. To begin with it is good to admit that the government must have the confidence of both chambers (Art. 94) which means to trust a report of a political nature between the government and both houses of Parliament. Mind you, a problem of a political nature, the lack of trust between the Chamber of Deputies and the government can not be thought to overcome with an extraordinary measure of a constitutional nature. It 'true that, formally, the Port can melt even a single person (Article 88), but this hypothesis has its own sustainability policy rather than constitutional in nature. The constitutional law is an instrument in the service of politics, but not for this you have to bend to politics. The early dissolution of a "drama" constitutional, is the certificate of premature death of a Legislature that serious problems relating to parliamentary life has not been able to complete his term, but an act of extraordinary importance that it is only by Chapter State can not be taken if not in the interest of the country everything. It 'clear even to the creatures that the dissolution of the room "bad" would result in the PDR typhoid implied in favor of those political forces that occupy most of the benches of the House otherwise good solution would make no sense even from the start. Moreover, such a measure would lead to a mismatch on the timing of parliamentary life for our perfect bicameralism seems unthinkable. In fact, the historical examples do not stand comparison with the current; what happened in '53 to '63 touches the constitutional nature of the problem is the realignment of the Houses of parliamentary life, after the initial decision of the Constituent to last six years the regular term of the Senate. In short, the policy review is a division and the law stands or falls mainly for its certainty. Making questionable legal certainty means first of all to undermine the integrity of the system and not offer bold solutions and impartial. In my opinion, the only positive aspect of this hypothesis is that presumably the no-confidence motion submitted to the Chamber of Deputies will be discussed around December 16 after the turn of the 14th, so if we started talking even now probably sensible road we ended up bored.
0 comments:
Post a Comment