Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Commercial Real Estate Sayings

Valdarno, but we really believe?

Municipality Act, Union of Municipalities, Management Associate Services. In the weeks leading up to the summer break the Valdarno councils have dealt with this topic, discussing the Act of address for the establishment of a Union of Municipalities of the towns of the Valdarno Aretino.
In our valley, some of these assumptions are already concrete. There is a Union of Municipalities, the Pratomagno, created and abolished by the homonymous mountain community in a partnership that manages a series of municipal services and other related mountain Pratomagno. There are management services related to: Montevarchi between Newfoundland and the Municipal Police, and between these Bucine for Personnel Management, the same choices involving St. John and Cavriglia between Pergine Bucine was born and the associated management of some of these planning instruments and with Laterina also the management of Social Services, Income Tax and the removal of architectural barriers. There is something going on and why, considering the time ripe, the Directors have considered Valdarnese that there were conditions to speak in an organic way of associated management of services and do so through an entity that had its own legal recognition, the fact Union of Municipalities.
Some political forces in the wake of a study done some years ago by a foundation, have raised the argument by proposing that we go over and talk Union but not of single communications.
The hypothesis is suggestive, giving rise to a single subject, Valdarno (if it ever was, dear administrators, we find a name that at least sounds better), with one mayor, one Board, one town clerk. Less bureaucracy, less costs and all happy. If you only look at the economic aspect, and especially the "cost of politics", the City would only further guarantees, at least the immediate and direct. In addition, the Valdarno is based on a single economic system that is more like that of a medium-sized cities rather than the small municipalities aggregated geographically. Sentimental issue (and parochial) apart it seems that the thing can really work.
But it may soon be operating within a single subject which takes in the fate of about 100 000 inhabitants and manage a territory of almost 600 square kilometers? The new municipality would take the size of the municipality of Arezzo. In this context, the Municipality Act to administer a single territory, but very large and heterogeneous (from the valley at the foot of Pratomagno), whose boundaries should be Laterina in Pian di Sco, San Giustino Valdarno Cavriglia, and areas within the same which would require up to three quarters of an hour by car (with normal traffic) to get in communication, but also areas with different needs.
A key aspect of the new entity should be linked to a political and institutional structures, necessary to create the proper relationship between citizens and institutions. A study on the subject made some years ago by the University of Siena for the Foundation of the above and presented in Valdarno showed a case which involved the establishment of three municipalities in three different municipalities while the head office of the Mayor and the Executive (the government) and City Council (Parliament) in the other two more common in the valley. The hypothesis of the municipalities is also included in the Consolidated Local Authorities (Art. 16 Legislative Decree 267/2000 and subsequent amendments. Changes), but it is sufficient to ensure a fair representation to the citizens of the territory of reference? Organization that can guarantee the proximity of the institutions to the citizens? The City is only a hypothesis in some ways fascinating, which is based less on cultural basis (not we live in a situation where the citizens of the municipalities in the Valdarno Valdarno citizens feel) but on a purely economic aspect. It 'not only necessary but essential, that if he could ever become a reality, Valdarno create the economies of scale able to save money to reinvest in more and higher quality services to its residents. And perhaps still not enough to convince the skeptics.
Paolo Bizzarri

0 comments:

Post a Comment